Advice on divorce proceedings by Kent expert

PUBLISHED: 13:24 18 March 2011 | UPDATED: 17:45 20 February 2013

Advice on divorce proceedings by Kent expert

Advice on divorce proceedings by Kent expert

Divorce is challenging enough, but if something unforseen happens after your settlement, can you revisit a court order once it's made?

Advice on divorce proceedings by Kent expert

Divorce is challenging enough, but if something unforseen happens after your settlement, can you revisit a court order once its made?

Do you feel the tension between wanting certainty and living a little dangerously? When you make a choice are you taking a chance? If things do not turn out as expected, what do you do? What if this happens on your divorce settlement?

Can legal advice provide the answers?

The law tries to. However, one size does not fit all. Recession can mean that agreements made between a divorcing couple can be affected by a change after granting of the order. This leads clients to ask:-

Can orders be changed?

Occasionally, but the test applied is quite tough. There is an obligation on the person challenging an order to prove factors such as, fraud, mistake, misrepresentation, undue influence, non-disclosure of a material fact, or the unforeseen.

Lets take the unforeseen. In the previous recession some people found their settlements were no longer workable. The court was slow to permit settlements to be modified and laid down four conditions namely:

1. A new event had to invalidate the basis for the fundamental assumption on which the order was made.

2. The event had to occur within a relatively short time from the date of the order.

3. An application to the court for leave to appeal must be made reasonably promptly.

4. There should be no prejudice to people who have acted in good faith based on the order made.

One reason to look for modification is changes of asset values. In the 1994 case of Cornick a wife attempted to vary a settlement after the husbands share values shot up enormously very soon after the order was made. The appeal on that occasion failed because it was said to be a change in good fortune of the husband that could have been predicted.

In 2010 is it any easier to unpick orders?

We are again in recession and assets are changing in value, invariably downward. However, in the case of Walkenden it was decided that a dramatic change in share values was nothing more than the natural process of price fluctuations so was foreseeable. It still remains difficult.

Would a change in the value of a home be treated differently?

Probably not. In the 2008 case of B it was alleged that the value of the home was wrong due to a misrepresentation by the husband. The court heard evidence of significant increase in the value of the property after the home was retained by the Husband. This was partly caused by a rise in the property market and partly through the husband doing work on the property. The court found that these factors whether they had been foreseen by the wife, or not, were reasonably foreseeable. Her claim did not succeed.

How foreseeable is the unexpected?

In Dixon v Marchant, in 2008 a former husband agreed to pay his former wife a lump sum to end maintenance. During negotiations she declared she had no plans to remarry (this would have ended maintenance with no lump sum). Six months after the order, she remarried. The husband appealed arguing that the remarriage invalidated the order that he pay. The court did not agree. They found no deceit or lack of disclosure by the former wife. The court believed her evidence that the remarriage had not been planned when the order was made.

While unexpected things do happen there is no guarantee that this will allow you to revisit a Court Order. It is important to think about all possibilities before it is made. But how can you plan for the unforeseeable or unexpected? Well, good legal advice is always a start!


Dawn Harrison is a Resolution accredited specialist in the field of family law including divorce, separation, injunctions, financial provision, pensions and children. A qualified mediator and collaborative family lawyer, she is Chair of Resolutions Kent Regional Group.

More from People

Thursday, September 17, 2020

80 years after the Battle of Britain, Richard Bates recalls the role his father H.E. Bates played in telling the stories of the famous ‘Few’ | Words: Richard Bates

Read more
Thursday, September 10, 2020

They were petty Kent criminals, sentenced to transportation to New South Wales, who became ‘Australian royalty’ as part of the ‘First Fleet’ | Words: John Wright

Read more
Friday, September 4, 2020

The Princess Royal, who celebrates her 70th birthday this month, reflects on her happy time at Benenden School near Cranbrook | Words: Bernard Bale

Read more

Kent Life meets some of the people working hard to save our historic vessels from the scrap heap

Read more
Tuesday, August 25, 2020

Take a step back in time to the good old days with these vintage videos from around Kent

Read more
Tuesday, August 18, 2020

King Kong star Naomi Watts may be an Oscar-nominated actor, but she’s proud of her Kentish roots

Read more
Monday, August 10, 2020

Like any place of learning, an independent school should be a second home, somewhere pupils can count on for support and inspiration as they develop as individuals.

Read more
Wednesday, August 5, 2020

Tradition continues at Chartwell, the family home of Sir Winston Churchill in Westerham, with the arrival of its newest recruit – a marmalade cat named Jock

Read more
Monday, August 3, 2020

Phil Wise, Head of the Senior School at Kent College Canterbury (KC), shares the benefits of pastoral care and why student welfare should be the number one priority for any school.

Read more

Nina Callow reveals why she’s documenting her family’s life in lockdown

Read more
Kent Life Food & Drink awards. Open for entries.

Subscribe or buy a mag today

subscription ad

Follow us on Twitter

Like us on Facebook

Local Business Directory

Search For a Car In Your Area

Latest from the Kent Life